![]() ![]() In the "Methods" section of the paper, the authors claimed they "performed a systematic review of all published autopsy and necropsy reports relating to COVID-19 vaccination through May 18th, 2023." According to the paper, the PubMed and ScienceDirect databases were used to collect the information presented. The Daily Sceptic article is correct in that the full paper, called "A Systematic Review of Autopsy Findings in Deaths after COVID-19 Vaccination," which is not a study, didn't spend much time on The Lancet website. (Source: The Daily Sceptic screenshot taken on Thu Jul 6 15:12:30 2023 UTC) ![]() This is what the post looked like on The Daily Sceptic website at the time of the writing of this fact check: The claims appeared in an article (archived here) published by The Daily Sceptic on July 6, 2023, and titled "Lancet Study on Covid Vaccine Autopsies Finds 74% Were Caused by Vaccine - Study is Removed Within 24 Hours." The article opened: A Lancet review of 325 autopsies after Covid vaccination found that 74% of the deaths were caused by the vaccine - but the study was removed within 24 hours. Not SupportedÄid a preprint paper submitted to The Lancet on July 5, 2023, find that 74 percent of the deaths in the autopsies it reviewed were caused by the COVID-19 vaccine? Additionally, was it also a legitimate study from The Lancet? No, neither is true: The preprint paper never made it past the submission stage with the medical journal because The Lancet said it "violated our screening criteria." As a result, the paper was never peer-reviewed, which subjects it to the scrutiny of others who are experts in the same field (peers) and is considered necessary to ensure academic scientific quality.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |